Cases 1 - 10 of 68
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Sacramento et al v. TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 2:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Watson Pharma Inc., Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Calfornia and City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Sacramento et al v. TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 2:2020at00890
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Watson Pharma Inc., Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Calfornia and City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Chico et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00876
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Chico and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Chico et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2020at00424
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Chico and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv06799
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte and The People of The State of California
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
