Cases 1 - 10 of 59
The New York Times Company et al v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
as 1:2022cv03609
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Adam Goldman v. Sheriff of Polk County, Florida, et al
as 22-11308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, HOWARD L. DIMMIG, II, Public Defender, PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Lance Goldman
as 20-1241
Petitioner:
In re: LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent:
SHANE JACKSON, Warden
Lance Goldman v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 20-1030
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICK VANDENBURG, Lieutenant, CHRISTOPHER WHITFORD, Hearing Investigator, LEE MCROBERTS, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant:
RICK SNYDER, et al.
Goldman v. Winn et al
as 2:2019cv13047
Defendant:
Carla Gross, Crawford, Mr. Zummer and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Goldman v. Abbott-Dickenson et al
as 8:2019cv01537
Defendant:
Centennial Bank, Rosanna Abbott-Dickenson, Ian Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman and All Style Tile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman et al v. Winn
as 2:2019cv12011
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, Depart of Corrections and Thomas Winn
Petitioner:
Lance Adam Goldman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
