Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Connor v. Talon Air, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Adam Katz and Talon Air, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phillip Connor
Martinez et. al. v. Top Notch Contracting Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv06106
Plaintiff:
Oscar Martinez and Javier Martinez
Defendant:
Adam Katz, Top Notch Contracting Inc., Jerry Rynkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Gonzalez v. Talon Air Inc. et. al.
as 2:2018cv04415
Defendant:
Adam Katz and Talon Air Inc.
Plaintiff:
Margarita Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Katz v. Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06488
Plaintiff:
Adam Katz
Defendant:
Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Amaya v. Talon Air Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05403
Plaintiff:
Luis Amaya
Defendant:
Adam Katz and Talon Air Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hall Tank Company LLC v. Talon Air Inc et al
as 4:2015cv00424
Plaintiff:
Hall Tank Company LLC
Defendant:
Talon Air Inc , Stratosphere Development Co LLC and Adam Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Countryman v. City Of Aurora et al
as 1:2013cv02971
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Countryman
Defendant:
City Of Aurora, Aurora Police Department, Eugenia Kupicki-Rochford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Countryman v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2013cv02936
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Countryman
Defendant:
County of Kane, James Hallock, Adam Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNIV OF PITTSBURGH V HEDRICK
as 08-1468
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Dr. Adam Katz, Dr. Ramon Llull and Univ of Pittsburgh - Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Defendant-Appellant:
Hermann Peter Lorenz, Marc H. Hedrick, Min Zhu and others
Hermann Peter Lorenz:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
