Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Porretti v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01745
Defendant:
Aranas, Dzurenda, Linda Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Porretti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wirth v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00376
Defendant:
CCS III, Dawan Deal, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Wirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James v. Dejong et al
as 2:2017cv01594
Defendant:
Customer Assistance Group, Robert Dejong, Sam Dommer and others
Plaintiff:
Joann James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Horta-Castrejon v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv01567
Defendant:
Al Gallman, Jeanne Kent, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Raul Horta-Castrejon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Castellanos v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00902
Defendant:
Peter Castellanos, Adam Paul Laxalt, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Filson et al
as 2:2017cv00475
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Marlo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hosmer v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00064
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, James Cox, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hosmer v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2017cv00056
Defendant:
Aranas, Artinger, Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corzine v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00052
Defendant:
Patrick J. Conmay, Adam Paul Laxalt, K. Lomprey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Corzine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLellan v. Baker et al
as 2:2016cv03038
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Curt McLellan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
