Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Goodman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09648
Plaintiff:
Jason Goodman
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, George Ebrahim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman v. Bouzy
as 23-1100
Appellant:
Jason Goodman
Counter Claimant:
David George Sweigert
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Ellis Bouzy, Bot Sentinel, Inc., George Webb Sweigert and others
Goodman v. Bouzy
as 23-874
Plaintiff:
Jason Goodman
Counter Claimant:
David George Sweigert
Defendant:
Christopher Ellis Bouzy, Bot Sentiel, Inc., George Webb Sweigert and others
Adam Sharpe v. Warden
as 2:2022cv08874
Petitioner:
Adam Sharpe
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweigert v. Goodman
as 22-682
Appellant:
D. George Sweigert
Counter Claimant:
Jason Goodman
3Rd Party Defendant:
George Webb Sweigert, Robert David Steele, Steven S. Biss and others
Defendant:
Multisystem Design, Inc. (MSDI), a New York Chartered Corporation
Sweigert v. Sharp
as 21-3101
Plaintiff:
Jason Goodman
Appellant:
D. George Sweigert
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Sharp, Terrance O'Reilly, Margaret Esquenet and others
Goodman v. Sharp et al
as 1:2021cv10627
Plaintiff:
Jason Goodman
Defendant:
Adam Sharp, Terrance O'Reilly, Margaret Esquenet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sweigert v. Goodman
as 21-78
3Rd Party Defendant:
George Webb Sweigert, Marcus Conte, Tyroan Simpson, AKA Frank Bacon and others
Appellant:
D. George Sweigert
Counter Claimant:
Jason Goodman
Defendant:
Multisystem Design, Inc. (MSDI), a New York Chartered Corporation
(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman, et al.
as 1:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, S Smith, D. Rhoads and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Montgomery
as 3:2016cv01947
Petitioner:
Adam Sharpe
Respondent:
W. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
