Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Adams v. FAA
as 24-9528
Petitioner: BRUCE ADAMS, DBA Southwest Safaris
Respondent: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Hardy v. Rabie, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff: RALPH MARCUS HARDY
Defendant: RABIE, Deputy, DEHERRERA, Detention Specialist; and Two Unknown Masked Deputies, ADAMS COUNTY, a Municipality and others
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff: GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant: KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff: JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant: JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1100
Petitioner: ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent: STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
In re: Adams, et al
as 24-4026
Petitioner: LARRY ADAMS, JED R. CHRISTENSEN, KIRK R. HARRISON and others
Respondent: ROY NIELSEN HAFEN and WILLIAM T. THURMAN
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant: JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
Zilm v. Harpe
as 24-5015
Petitioner: ADAM CLAYTON ZILM
Respondent: STEVEN HARPE
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner: ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent: STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Adams v. United States
as 24-1037
Plaintiff: ERIC ADAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?