Cases 11 - 20 of 571
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford and Kerry P Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez v. Jay Management Company LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Miriam Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jay Management Company LLC, Liberty County TX, Robert Hilton Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. WBR Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Gianna Adams and Gianni Adams
Defendant:
WBR Funding, LLC, James MacDonald and Tammy MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Strege v. Charles Schwab et al
as 3:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Uranium One, Energy Fuels and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
