Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,002
Sanchez v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11273
Petitioner: Christopher Sanchez, Sr.
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner: Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor: Kendra Feltner
Defendant: Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00722
Petitioner: Adam Carson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Clark v. City of Nashville, The et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: Antonio Clark
Defendant: City of Nashville, The, State of Tennessee, The, Buddy Rhett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Clark v. Adam Cruter, et al
as 24-5352
Plaintiff: ANTONIO CLARK
Defendant: ADAM D. CRUTER, Officer, ERIC JACKSON, Officer, RHETT BUDDY, Officer and others
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner: RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent: Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant: Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Hare v. Adam Douglas
as 24-1271
Petitioner: TIMOTHY HARE
Respondent: ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?