Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Pinney v. Police of la Salle, IL et al
as 1:2023cv12414
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pinney and Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
Police of la Salle, IL, Housing Authority of la Salle County IL, Court of la Salle County, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11557
Defendant:
Orzon Rubio, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Bristol County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Evans Emons Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames-Garcia v. Divris
as 1:2021cv11016
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Petitioner:
Jorge Adames-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sifton v. North Adams, City of et al
as 3:2021cv30057
Defendant:
North Adams, Berkshire County, North Adams, City of, Kevin Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Richard F Sifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30125
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Spaulding
as 1:2020cv10786
Petitioner:
David M. Adams
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall et al v. Capeless et al
as 3:2019cv30138
Defendant:
Rose Dawson, Erin Goffney, Joseph A Pieropan and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall and EME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schatten v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv12066
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts and Maura Healey
Petitioner:
Adam B. Schatten
Sandofsky v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2017cv11309
Petitioner:
Adam Todd Sandofsky
Respondent:
Steven W. Thompkins and Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
