Cases 1 - 10 of 2,442
Adams v. PANERA BREAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Luke Adams
Defendant:
PANERA BREAD COMPANY and PANERA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ADAMS v. KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
SHAMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sciarra v. State Capitol Police Dept et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarra
Defendant:
State Capitol Police Dept and Adam Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charpentier et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Charpentier and Samara Charpentier
Defendant:
Dallas Gatley, Kris Raymond Adams and Jamie Palverento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
