Cases 41 - 50 of 708
MARTIN v. CUPP et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CUPP, BLAYZE RODGERS, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
NICHALAUS DONOVAN, ERIC DRADA, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. YARBER et al
as 2:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
RICK YARBER, CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ, NICHALAUS DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryson v. Lippert Component Plant 58 et al
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Tyaire A Bryson
Defendant:
Lippert Component Plant 58, Austin Adams, Jackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTEGA v. DEMISSIE et al
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FERNANDEZ ORTEGA
Defendant:
SHIMELESS DEMISSIE, ADAM C DANIEL, HNA TRUCKING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Hecke v. Beck et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven John Hecke
Defendant:
Richard Beck, David Gladieux, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Adams v. Ameristar Casino East Chicago, LLC
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adams
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago, LLC and Penn Sports Interactive, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Swick v. LifeLock
as 3:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
LifeLock and Norton Lifelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
