Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Norma Valenzuela v. Advantage Sales and Marketing LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Norma Valenzuela
Defendant:
Advantage Sales and Marketing LLC, The Board of Directors of Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC, The Advantage 401(k) Savings Plan Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Brenda Lucero, et al v. Credit Union Retirement Plan Association, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
BRENDA L. LUCERO, HEATHER BARTON, ILONA KOMPANIIETS and others
Respondent:
CREDIT UNION RETIREMENT PLAN ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CREDIT UNION RETIREMENT PLAN ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF RETIREMENT PLANS and others
Robert Cockerill, et al v. Corteva Inc, et al
as 23-8051
Respondent:
DARRELL D. BENSON, Individually and as Representatives on Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, ROBERT F. COCKERILL, OLIVER MAJOR and others
Petitioner:
BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, CORTEVA INC, DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC and others
Miller v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Change of Control Severance Plan et al
as 4:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Brad Miller
Defendant:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Change of Control Severance Plan and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Health and Welfare Benefits Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Andrew Albert v. Oshkosh Corporation, et al
as 21-2789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
OSHKOSH CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OSHKOSH CORPORATION, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE OSHKOSH CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PLANS and others
Daniel Matousek, et al v. MidAmerican Energy Company, et al
as 21-2749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel C. Matousek, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Teresa J. Cantu, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Leah M. Maloney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MidAmerican Energy Company, The Board of Directors of MidAmerican Energy Company, MidAmerican Energy Company Pension and Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee and others
Tom Hensiek, et al v. Board of Directors of Casino Q, et al
as 21-1177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON GILL and TOM HENSIEK
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY WATSON, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CASINO QUEEN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., also known as CASINO QUEEN BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE CASINO QUEEN EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and others
Soto v. Disney Severance Pay Plan
as 20-4081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nancy J. Soto
Defendant / Appellee:
John Does 1-20, as members of the Investment and Administrative Committee of The Walt Disney Company Sponsored Qualified Benefit Plans and Key Employees Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plan, Investment and Administrative Committee of The Walt Disney Company Sponsored Qualified Benefit Plans and Key Employees Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plan, Disney Severance Pay Plan and others
Vicki Michael v. ConAgra Brands Inc Pension, et al
as 20-36030
Defendant / Appellee:
CONAGRA BRANDS APPEALS COMMITTEE, AKA Appeals Committee, CONAGRA BRANDS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, the Plan Administrator, AKA Administrative Commitee and CONAGRA BRANDS INC PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY PRODUCTION WORKERS, an employee pension benefit Plan, AKA Pension Plan
Defendant:
DOES, I-XX; individual members of the Plan administrative and/or appeals committees
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICKI MICHAEL, individually and as representative on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons
Pizarro et al v. The Home Depot,Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04660
Plaintiff:
Jaime H. Pizarro, Craig Smith, Marie Silver and others
Defendant:
The Home Depot,Inc., The Investment Committee of the Home Depot FutureBuiler 401(K) Plan and The Administrative Committee of the Home Depot Futurebuilder 401(K) Plan
Petitioner:
Financial Engines Advisors, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
