Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Madhuri Trivedi v. LABR
as 23-1265
Petitioner:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Edwards v. Ek et al
as 2:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Edwards
Defendant:
J Ek, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Administrative Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Raphael Taylor
Defendant:
State of Illinois, District II Chicago Police Station, District II Chicago Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Logan Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
Carrie Jones
Defendant:
Logan Correctional Center, Chief Administration Review Board and Jean Marie Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Johnson v. ARB
as 22-60152
Petitioner:
Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor
Roger Reed v. LABR, et al
as 22-1235
Petitioner:
ROGER REED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Interested Party:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Ellis v. ARB
as 21-60953
Petitioner:
Mary Ann Ellis
Respondent:
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor
Jerome Yelder v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3857
Petitioner:
JEROME YELDER
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
