Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adolfo Rodriguez v. Orange County Probation Department
as 8:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Orange County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2023cv03256
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Rodriguez and Adolfo Rodriguez
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez Cevallos et al v. Hill and Dale Restaurant Group LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07278
Defendant:
William Waite, Hill and Dale Restaurant Group LLC, Arturo Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Rodriguez, Mauricio Jose Gomez Cevallos and Paulino Guzman Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Vera-Marquez
as 8:2018mj00382
Material Witne:
Adolfo Rodriguez Cruz
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Evelin Amairani Vera-Marquez (1)
Evelin Amairani Vera-Marquez
as 8:2018mj00382
Material Witne:
Adolfo Rodriguez Cruz
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Evelin Amairani Vera-Marquez (1)
Gabriela Archila-Hernandez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71217
Petitioner:
GABRIELA PATRICIA ARCHILA-HERNANDEZ, ELDER LEONEL ORELLANA-ARCHILA, VANESSA GABRIELA ORELLANA-ARCHILA and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Rodriguez v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
as 2:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Rodriguez
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Zickefoose
as 1:2013cv02902
Petitioner:
Adolfo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adolfo Rodriguez-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv05475
Petitioner:
Adolfo Rodriguez-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
