Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Nolan v. USA
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Adrian Nolan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Heard #252329 v. Dirschell et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard #252329
Defendant:
Adrian Dirschell, Jeremy Bush and Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Vandevender et al.
as 1:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Adrian Smith
Defendant:
Mark Vandevender and Lorain County Crime/Drug Lab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02327
Plaintiff:
Adrian Smith
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, D. Ditzler, C. Righettetti-Rimedio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Akram v. James Corrigan
as 23-1962
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADRIAN MAHDEE AKRAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
Moore et al v. Washington et al
as 5:2023cv11506
Plaintiff:
John Moore, II, Nazem Saad, Kenneth Matlock and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Mark King, Adrian Dirschell and others
Jones #302373 et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Quentin Jones #302373
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush, Brian Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd #318534 et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Darell Boyd #318534
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush, Brian Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tupper #981839 v. Wexstaff et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Adrian James Tupper #981839
Defendant:
Unknown Wexstaff and Unknown Maus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
