Cases 1 - 10 of 130
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Pasquotank County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023ct03359
Plaintiff:
Adrian Humphrey
Defendant:
Pasquotank County Sheriff's Office, Dare County Sheriff's Office, Dare County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETITE v. LG CHEM, LTD
as 1:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kent Petite
Defendant:
LG Chem, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montano v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Adrian Montano
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOWERY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00951
Petitioner:
ADRIAN STEPHEN LOWERY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ritchie et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01465
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DOWDUPONT, INC., EIDP, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAGE RITCHIE, ADRIAN STOKES and JADE WILDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
