Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Worsley v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv03415
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center and The State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Zulibeth Sarai Worsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worsley v. Sepulveda et al
as 1:2020cv03226
Defendant:
Ms. Poteet, Dr. Hindash, Ms. Sepulveda and others
Plaintiff:
Zulibeth S. Worsley and Zulibeth Sarai Worsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLS v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Rawls
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTT v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
SHERIFF DOYLE WOOTEN and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
JOHN RALPH LOTT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargle v. Henry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00340
Defendant:
Henry County Department of Adult Supervision and Henry County Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Cargle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Cobb Co Adult Detention Center
as 1:2019cv05811
Defendant:
Cobb Co Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Cobb County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2019cv04079
Defendant:
David Sanders, Sheriff Neil Warren, David Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Lord James Christopher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2019cv03114
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Jones
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ible v. Warren et al
as 1:2017cv05480
Plaintiff:
Dion T. Ible
Defendant:
Neil Warren and Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Floyd County Adult Detention Center
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Labron Harper
Defendant:
Floyd County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
