Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Not Yet Classified:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dignity Health, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California non-profit corporation and DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
San Joaquin Community Hospital, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit reiigious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Bakersfield, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation and as successor in interest to Central Valley General Hospital, fka Central Valley General Hospital, DBA Adventist Health Hanford, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Feather River and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
Defendant:
RICHARD FIGUEROA
San Joaquin Community Hospital et al v. Figueroa et al
as 3:2020cv01301
Defendant:
Raul Ramirez, Richard Figueroa, Bruce Lim and others
Plaintiff:
White Memorial Medical Center, Glendale Adventist Medical Center, San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fresno Community Hospital and, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lovelace Health System, Inc., doing business as Lovelace Medical Center - Downtown, Topeka Hospital, LLC, doing business as The University of Kansas Health System, St. Francis Campus, West Valley Medical Center, Inc., doing business as West Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Timothy McNair v. Adventist Medical Ctr Portland, et al
as 19-35037
Defendant / Appellee:
CROOK, DUSTIN V. SHACKLETON, M.D., ANDREA KLEIN, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY LUTHER MCNAIR
Millhorn v. Swedish Covenant Hospital et al
as 9:2018cv81722
Defendant:
Amita Health Adventist Medical Center, Chicago Fire Department, Swedish Covenant Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Nicole Millhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tulare Local Health Care Dist., et al v. DHCS, et al
as 18-16384
Petitioner - Appellant:
TULARE LOCAL HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, a California local health care district, DBA Tulare Regional Medical Center, ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER, a California corporation, EL CENTRO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, an agency of the City of El Centro and others
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and JENNIFER KENT, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services
BKD, LLP v Parkview Adventist Medical Center
as 6:2016mc09003
Interested_party:
BKD, LLP
Respondent:
Parkview Adventist Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: BANKRUPTCY DEBTOR PARKVIEW ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2016mc00227
Debtor:
PARKVIEW ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Trustee:
OFFICE OF US TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
