Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. ARO Liquidation, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06804
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
ARO Liquidation, Inc. f/k/a Aeropostale, Inc., ARO Liquidation, Inc. and Aeropostale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01993
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc., Walmart, Inc., Fashion Republic Inc. dba Tags Weekly and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Aeropostale, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04411
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Aeropostale, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Captain's Club Apparel, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.
as 3:2016cv30020
Plaintiff:
Captain's Club Apparel, Inc.
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Standard Fabrics International Inc v. Aeropostale Inc et al
as 2:2015cv08621
Defendant:
Aeropostale Inc, Does and Ross Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Standard Fabrics International Inc
Kobace LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00930
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Icon Laser Solutions LLC v. Aeropostale Inc
as 3:2015cv03310
Plaintiff:
Icon Laser Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberalis LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00950
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aeropostale Procurement Company, Inc. et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 1:2014cv02906
Plaintiff:
Aeropostale Procurement Company, Inc. and Aeropostale, Inc.
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
eDekka LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00398
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
