Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
MOHAMMED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65716
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Hage (Mamdouh Mahmud Salim)
as 21-2442
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, AKA Abu Hajer al Iraqi, AKA Abu Hajer
Ahmed Mohammed et al v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2021cv06844
Plaintiff:
RASHAD LUFT AHMED MOHAMMED, 1902 New Way Gourmet Inc. and Rashad Lutf Ahmed Mohammed
Defendant:
United States Dep't of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gamily v. Garland
as 21-312
Petitioner:
AHMED MOHAMMED SHERIF GAMILY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sheikh Osman v. Garland
as 21-60508
Petitioner:
Ahmed Mohammed Sheikh Osman
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
