Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fareed v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Association, Ebony Weathers, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Akram Ibin Fareed and Akram Fareed-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00578
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Alabama State Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Hancock et al
as 5:2018cv00552
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Defendant:
Daniel Hancock, Wolfe Jones Hancock Daniel & South LLC, Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Overall v. Watson et al
as 4:2017cv02063
Plaintiff:
Mark Overall
Defendant:
W. N. Watson , Jeremy McIntire , Alicia Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornett v. Alabama State Bar Association, The et al
as 2:2017cv00418
Petitioner:
Everett E Cornett, Jr
Respondent:
Alabama State Bar Association, The and John A Brinkley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas Cooner v. Alabama State Bar
as 15-14477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS HOWARD COONER
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA STATE BAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Som v. Supreme Court of Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Som
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Alabama and Alabama State Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
