Cases 41 - 50 of 321
Hulbert v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Adam Hulbert
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Traywick v. Alabama, State of
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Traywick
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Alabama, State of
as 4:2022cv00572
Petitioner:
Brian Lindsey
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harris v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 5:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Dexter Harris
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, ADOC Limestone Correctional Facility and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stallworth v. Alabama, State of
as 6:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tirrell Stallworth
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Kavli et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Randal B McCoy
Defendant:
Kavli and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alabama, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of and Georgia, State of
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Chris Mangus and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
