Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Young v. Wilson et al
as 6:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Willie Young
Defendant:
Alan M Wilson, SC Dept of Corrections, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pendarvis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Trenton Pendarvis
Defendant:
Alan M. Wilson, Mark A. Keel, Hugh E. Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Mr. Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden McKendley Newton, Mr. Alan M. Wilson and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Wilson
as 6:2021cv00544
Respondent:
Alan M Wilson and Broad River Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Michael A Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Invacare Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv04261
Defendant:
B Stirling, Tamaulipas Reymosa, Alan M Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. James
as 5:2020cv03013
Petitioner:
Bernard Bagley
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, Alan M Wilson and Tonya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. McMaster et al
as 3:2020cv01809
Defendant:
Jay Lucas, Donald W. Beatty, Alan M. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Newton et al
as 2:2019cv03179
Respondent:
Alan M Wilson and McKendley Newton
Petitioner:
Clark D Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Legette v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv01845
Plaintiff:
Roger Syntell Legette and Roger Syndell Legette
Defendant:
Alan M Wilson, Matthew Shane Twigg, Horry County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
