Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Parks v. JMS Construction Services Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv61262
Defendant:
JMS Construction Services Inc., Jaime M. Shlimbaum and Jason M. Shlimbaum
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alan Parks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ethan Podry, et al v. USDC-MHE
as 18-70509
:
In re: ETHAN PODRY, JAMES COLBURN, WILLIAM HOUSTON PARRY and others
Petitioner:
ETHAN PODRY, JAMES COLBURN, WILLIAM HOUSTON PARRY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Real Party In Interest:
JAMES SALMONSON, Warden
Park v. Salmonson
as 1:2018cv00021
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Thomas Alan Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Podry et al
as 6:2018cv00024
Petitioner:
Ethan Podry, James Colburn, William Houston Parry and others
Respondent:
Michael Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Park v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alan Park
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aby v. City of Cambridge et al
as 1:2014cv13256
Plaintiff:
Laetitia Aby
Defendant:
City of Cambridge, Cambridge Police Department, David Serino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deanthony Thomas, et al v. US Bank NA ND, et al
as 14-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deanthony Thomas, Susan Jelinek-Thomas, Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust, 1996-2, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1996-3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Bank National Association, Ace Securities Corp. Home Loan Trust 1999-A, Associates First Capital Corporation, doing business as The Associates and others
Thomas et al v. US Bank NA ND et al
as 5:2011cv06013
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Thomas , Susan Jelinek-Thomas , Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND , US Bank , Ace Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
