Cases 1 - 10 of 415
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Duncan v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Alan R. Duncan
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hyman v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Hyman
Defendant:
Joseph Baron, Norfolk Police Department, Officer J. L. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naomi Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 23-55475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAOMI BAR-LEV
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, JONATHAN DUNGAN, JASON LANGLEY and others
Kaye et al v. Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Barry Kaye and Ahron Berlin
Defendant:
Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., Barry S. Franklin, Olivia Retenauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Kaye et al v. Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
Barry Kaye and Ahron Berlin
Defendant:
Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., Barry S. Franklin, Olivia Retenauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Story v. Bingham et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Story
Defendant:
Scot Bingham, Kari Long Dworkin and Matt Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easom v. Sharps Technology Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
John Easom
Defendant:
Sharps Technology Inc. and Alan R. Blackman
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
