Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
USA v. Alan Johnson
as 18-50189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Alan Johnson v. Darleen Drew, et al
as 17-11439
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 5:2017hc02121
Petitioner:
Alan Wade Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Justin F. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
Alan Wade Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TX 78216
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alan Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 16-10534
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
JOHNSON v. DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 1:2015cv01678
Plaintiff:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES , RESDIENT AGENT IN-CHARGE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES , CHIEF COUNSEL, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Johnson v. Paxton et al
as 4:2015cv00524
Petitioner:
Alan Wade Johnson
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Darleen Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
