Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimberly Diei v. Randy Boyd, et al
as 23-5771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY DIEI
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY BOYD, in his individual and official capacity as President of the Univeristy of Tennessee System, CHRISTA GEORGE, in her individual and official capacity as Chair of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy's Professional Conduct Committee, BRAD BOX and others
Diei v. Boyd et al
as 2:2021cv02071
Defendant:
Charles Hatcher, Decosta Jenkins, Jamie Woodson and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Diei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Wilson
as 4:2017mj30398
Defendant:
Jerome Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Wilson
as 4:2017mj30398
Defendant:
Jerome Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Wilson v. USA
as 4:2015cv12614
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerome Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Julian Rochester v. Federal Prison Director, et al
as 15-5670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL PRISON DIRECTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM N. NETTLES, S.C. U.S. Attorney and others
Julian Rochester v. William Nettles, et al
as 15-5474
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM N. NETTLES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ALAN WILSON and others
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
