Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Martinez Toscano v. Garland
as 24-1815
Petitioner:
RAMON ALBERTO MARTINEZ TOSCANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. Iqbal et al
as 2:2024cv01792
Plaintiff:
Rafael Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Gul K. Iqbal, Raja Iqbal, Rollie's Smoke Shop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martinez v. Snider
as 2:2023cv01193
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Derek Snider and Warden, Charlotte Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. Parc West Valet Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10862
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Martinez Arellano
Defendant:
Parc West Valet Cleaners, Inc., West 57 Cleaners Corp., Yun W Choung and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez Medina v. Garland
as 23-60577
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Martinez Medina
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09404
Plaintiff:
JORGE ALBERTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez-De Paz v. Garland
as 23-60228
Petitioner:
Jaime Alberto Martinez-De Paz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez, REGIO TRANSPORATION S.A. DE C.V. and Jorge Alberto Martinez doing business as Regio Transportation S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture in Rem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
