Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PAGAN MIEJAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13981
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO PAGAN MIEJAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Velez-Olan et al
as 3:2020cv01502
Defendant:
Richard Alexia Pagan-Caraballo, Rene Alberto Pagan-Nunez, Carlos A Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PAGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02682
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO PAGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Pagan Lopez
as 3:2015cv02715
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Pagan-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pagan v. United States District
as 7:2012cv00170
Petitioner:
Alberto Pagan
Respondent:
United States District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alberto Pagan v. Marilyn Brooks, et al
as 08-4753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO PAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILYN BROOKS, DA PHILADELPHIA, ATTY GEN PA and others
Alberto Pagan v. Marilyn Brooks, et al
as 08-4752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO PAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILYN BROOKS, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
PAGAN v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2007cv04780
Petitioner:
ALBERTO PAGAN
Respondent:
MARILYN S. BROOKS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAGAN v. BROOKS
as 2:2007cv02732
Petitioner:
ALBERTO PAGAN
Respondent:
MARILYN S. BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pagan-Contreras v. Ledezma
as 3:2007cv01585
Plaintiff:
Alberto Pagan-Contreras
Defendant:
Hector Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
