Cases 1 - 10 of 11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALCAZAR NETWORKS, INC.
as 5:2019cv03283
Defendant:
ALCAZAR NETWORKS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MERCADO v. ALCAZAR et al
as 2:2019cv02118
Defendant:
LOIONETTI ASSOCIATES, INC., EDGAR ALCAZAR and LOIONETTI ASSOCIATES, INC. doing business as LORCO PETROLEUM SERVICES
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MERCADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TORO v. TORO et al
as 2:2015cv08482
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO
Defendant:
VICTOR H. TORO, ROSEANN BAFFIGE, JUDGE ROBERTO ALCAZAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
ALCAZAR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57322
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO F. ALCAZAR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
AGRICOM LTDA. v. M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER et al
as 2:2010cv01231
Plaintiff:
AGRICOM LTDA.
Defendant:
M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER, NYK COOL AB , ALCAZAR SHIPPING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
CYD INTERNATIONAL S.A. et al v. M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER et al
as 2:2010cv00700
Plaintiff:
CYD INTERNATIONAL S.A., EXPORTADORA AQUA SANTA S.A., COMMERCIAL GREENVIC S.A. and others
Defendant:
M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER, LCL SWEDEN AB, NYK COOL AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
WILLIAM H. KOPKE, JR., INC. v. M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER et al
as 1:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. KOPKE, JR., INC.
Defendant:
M/V ALCAZAR CARRIER, LCL SWEDEN AB, NYK COOL AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Vasquez-Alcazar v. Ebbert
as 10-1142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE VASQUEZ-ALCAZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT
Vasquez-Alcazar v. Ebbert
as 3:2009cv02233
Petitioner:
Jamie Vasquez-Alcazar
Respondent:
Dave Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
