Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-55209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and XAVIER BECERRA, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 23-55157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner:
State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party:
County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae:
Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Henry Ealy, III, et al v. Robert Redfield, et al
as 22-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. HENRY EALY III, SENATOR DENNIS LINTHICUM and SENATOR KIM THATCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT REDFIELD, former Director of the US Center for Disease Control, in his individual capacity, ROCHELLE WALENSKY, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Director for the US Center for Disease Control, ALEX M. AZAR II, former Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, in his individual capacity and others
Mark Higgins, et al v. Mark Higgins, et al
as 22-16470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ROCK HIGGINS, beneficiary private irish moor aboriginal Arizonian national, subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and HIGGINS FAMILY TRUST, a private express trust trustee of Mark Rock Higgins
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROCK HIGGINS, Mark Rock Higgins Estate, SEAN RICK HIGGINS, Sean Rick Higgins Estate, TYLER ROCK HIGGINS, Tyron Rock Higgins Estate and others
Timothy M. Ryan v. Alex M. Azar II
as 8:2020cv02442
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Ryan
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 21-15091
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 503, CAMILLE CHRISTIAN, VIRGINIA GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
American Hospital Association et al v. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 4:2020cv08806
Defendant:
Secretary Alex M. Azar, II and Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
St. Mary's Medical Center, American Hospital Association, Riverside Regional Medical Center and others
Petitioner:
Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Silverado Hospice, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-56348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILVERADO HOSPICE, INC., a Delaware corporation and PROCARE HOSPICE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services
Steven Bruce v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-17565
Defendant:
ENVISION INSURANCE COMPANY and BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN BRUCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
