Cases 51 - 60 of 77
State of California, et al v. March for Life, et al
as 19-15150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MARCH FOR LIFE EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
All Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. Azar, II
as 3:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
All Home Medical Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California, et al v. The Little Sisters of the Poor, et al
as 19-15072
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv03045
Plaintiff:
Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Teresa Gall and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar II, Diane Foley, Office of Population Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sensory NeuroStimulation, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-55036
Plaintiff:
FRED BURBANK, MD, CEO, President, Board Chairman, and stock holder
Defendant:
LAURENCE WILSON, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, SEEMA VERMA, Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, DEMETRIOS KOUZOUKAS, Principal Deputy Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SENSORY NEUROSTIMULATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar II et al
as 4:2019cv05035
Plaintiff:
Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Teresa Gall and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar II, Diane Foley, Office of Population Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Oregon et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 6:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Robert Odell, Jr., et al v. HHS, et al
as 19-15262
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT ODELL, M.D., PH.D. MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, A Nevada Corporation and ROBERT H. ODELL, Jr.
Foo, M.D. v. Azar II
as 1:2018cv00490
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Wendell Foo, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
