Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Truist Bank v. Bolden et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank, formerly known as Branch Banking Company, Branch Banking Company and Truist Bank
Defendant:
Hattie H. Bolden, Brandy L. Bolden, Edward Allen Bolden, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Steven Bolden
as 20-30168
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN ALEXANDER BOLDEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Steven Alexander Bolden v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2020cv04392
Defendant:
Felicia Ponce
Plaintiff:
Steven Alexander Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Alexander Bolden v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2020cv03870
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Bolden v. USA
as 20-35194
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN ALEXANDER BOLDEN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bolden v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv01289
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Van Bolden v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 13-2774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN ALEXANDER BOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, DANIEL MORECI, TYRONE MILLER and others
Bolden v. Dart et al
as 1:2011cv08661
Plaintiff:
Van Alexander Bolden
Defendant:
Tom Dart, D. Moreci, Tyrone Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. River Birch Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01264
Plaintiff:
JaByron Wilson , Shirley Rogers , Marcus Dunaway and others
Defendant:
River Birch Homes, Inc., River Birch Homes, L.L.C. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01274
Plaintiff:
Terrell Reed , Yvonne Jones , Danielle Jones and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Bechtel National, Inc, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
