Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 9:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Ms. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Green Haven Correctional Facility, Superintendent Miller and ORC A. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Alexander Holmes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2023cv04140
Plaintiff:
Ms. Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Groder, Michael Kamperveen and Andrea Shiry Ann Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 6:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ms. Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Groder, Michael Kamperveen and Andrea Shiry Ann Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Howard
as 9:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Fersinda et al
as 9:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes and Misso Holmes
Defendant:
Fersinda, D. Carbanero, R. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonsa et al v. Wilcher
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Mendez Alonsa, Jose Torres Gomez, James Blige and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11526
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALEXANDER HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
