Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alvarenga-Henriquez v. Garland
as 24-735
Petitioner:
FLOR GRISELDA ALVARENGA-HENRIQUEZ and DIEGO ALEXIS ORTIZ-ALAVARENGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexi Ortiz v. Michael Higgs
as 23-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEXI ORTIZ
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. HIGGS, Director, State Department of Assessments & Taxation, officially as both a state and local official, and/or individually
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and STEPHEN J. MCGIBBON, in his official capacity as Director, Prince George's County Department of Finance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fuentes Ortiz v. Garland
as 22-828
Petitioner:
LEYDIN YANETH FUENTES ORTIZ and DARWIN ALEXI ORTIZ FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Meeks v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06163
Plaintiff:
Demond Meeks
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Alexis Ortiz, Tyler Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adamides et al v. Warren et al
as 6:2021cv06613
Plaintiff:
Katherine Adamides, Mary Adams, Joseph Allman and others
Defendant:
Lovely Ann Warren, The City Of Rochester, Troy Taladay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andriy Ortiz-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1949
Petitioner:
ANDRIY ALEXIS ORTIZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Ortiz v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01169
Defendant:
Michael L. Higgs, Stephen J. McGibbon and Prince George's County, Maryland
Plaintiff:
Alexi Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Ortiz Avelar v. Barr
as 19-3450
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Orbin Alexi Ortiz Avelar, AKA Orbin Alexi Ortiz
Alexis Ortiz Herrera v. William Barr
as 19-71946
Petitioner:
ALEXIS ORTIZ HERRERA, AKA Alexis Ortiz
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
