Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04566
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Alvarez v. The City of New York
as 26-2576
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALVAREZ
Defendant:
ALEXIS SOTO, Police Officer, Shield Number 13519, in her individual and official capacity, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRONX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIDER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02025
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS RIDER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
RIDER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 3:2026cv01816
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS RIDER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05284
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Arreola v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv10326
Plaintiff:
Alexis Arreola
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
