Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Holley et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2018cv06972
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, Noel Flores, Carlos Proctor and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc., James W. Terry, Cynthia N. Jones and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Terrerce Smith, Aamira Mosely, Aaron C. Richardson, Sr. and others
Respondent:
Hilliard Martinez Gonzales LLP and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Consolidated Defendant:
Wanda A Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant:
Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Milici
Interested Party:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner:
NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Plaintiff:
John Pham, Diana Lazarte, Marco Cuevas and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jung, David Murphy, Justin LaBarge and others
Defendant:
Air France, S.A., Qantas Airways, Ltd., All Nippon Airways and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Amy Yang, Xanadu Corp and David Gould
Claimant:
Michael Chekian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 8:2016ml02693
Defendant:
Vizio Inscape Technologies LLC, Vizio Holdings Inc, Alphonso Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Milewski, Caroline Tongarm, Charron Wright and others
In Re:
Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Intervenor:
The Center for Investigative Reporting
Amicus Curiae:
The Direct Marketing Association, Inc. and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Managed Care Advisory Group, LLC et al v. All Defendants
as 3:2020cv01623
Petitioner:
David Garcia and Cigna Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
All Defendants
In Re:
Managed Care Litigation
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs and Managed Care Advisory Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Premera Blue Cross Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 3:2015md02633
Special Master:
Henry Kantor
In Re:
Premera Blue Cross
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other:
Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified:
All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party:
Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2018md02828
In Re:
Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
