Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,589
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv03710
Petitioner: Kraig Payne
Respondent: . Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00770
Petitioner: AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff: KRIS KANABLE
Defendant: TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01174
Plaintiff: Kraig Payne
Defendant: . Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Plaintiff: JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant: TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valerie Flores v. Allen Horn, et al
as 24-1746
Plaintiff: VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant: ALLEN HORN, CODY WOODS, HOPE BARAJAS and others
Titus Henderson v. Mike Donovan, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff: TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant: MIKE DONOVAN, DAVID BROOKS, JODIE PERTTU and others
Thomas Mucha, et al v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 24-1720
Plaintiff: THOMAS MUCHA, Shareholder of Buzz Energies Inc and DIANE K. MUELLER
Appellant: JAMES D. LAMMERS, also known as JAMES D. KURTZ
Defendant: STATE OF WISCONSIN, SHEBOYGAN COUNTY, WISCONSIN, RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and others
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner: GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harp v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant: Quality Correctional Care LLC, Allen County Sheriff, Quality Correctional LLC and others
Plaintiff: Eric David Harp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?