Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Tennis et al
as 8:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Allen G Tennis, Jr, Margaret Sue Mullins Tennis, South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Herbert Andrew v. US
as 15-1515
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HERBERT ALLEN ANDREW, JAMES P. APLINGTON, KENNETH W. FRASER and others
Plaintiff:
JACK C. DIXON, ESTATE OF BENJAMIN F. FORTUNE, N. CLAYTON LEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Dockery et al
as 5:2014cv00130
Defendant:
Allen Dockery and Hollie T. Dockery
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Allen et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Susann Allen and Rachel D Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States v. Patterson et al
as 1:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Allen W. Patterson and Brenda L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JERRY B. CLAYTON, et al
as 1:2010cv00198
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JERRY B. CLAYTON, DEBORAH P. CLAYTON, ALLENE S. CLAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
ANDREW, et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
HERBERT ALLEN ANDREW , JAMES P. APLINGTON , JACK C. DIXON and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEMP
as 1:2007cv00610
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALLEN W. KEMP
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEMP
as 1:2007mc00030
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALLEN W. KEMP
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
