Cases 1 - 10 of 292
CRUCE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04892
Plaintiff:
ALLISON CRUCE
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Feinberg v. Cintron et al
as 1:2024cv01377
Defendant:
Lee Ann Tarasi, Jeff Enders, Laval Miller-Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRICE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04209
Plaintiff:
ALLISON PRICE
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLISON v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and ABBIE TATE
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SCOTT ALLISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
as 3:2024cv00846
Defendant:
Mohamad Hoteit, Miguel Baquero, June Varn and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allison v. Arvisa
as 3:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Christopher Allison
Respondent:
M. Arvisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hollinger et al v. Menges et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Terry-Lee: Hollinger and Michelle-Lynn: Hollinger
Defendant:
Judge Matthew D. Menges, Allison Blew, Sheriff Richard P. Keuleber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
