Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Littlefield et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2022cv10273
Plaintiff:
David Littlefield, Michelle Littlefield, Tracy Acord and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ALMEIDA v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2021cv11346
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ALMEIDA
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carresi v. City of Newton
as 1:2020cv11538
Plaintiff:
Brian Malo, James White, Stephen Hodgdon and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mathew Almeida v. Duclos
as 1:2020cv10142
Plaintiff:
Jacobs I Mathew Almeida
Defendant:
Daniel J. Duclos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tomaz et al v. Max Ultimate Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10533
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Costa, Demilsa Silva, Luciano Casemiro and others
Defendant:
Neal Balkowich and Max Ultimate Food, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Almeida v. Cowin
as 1:2019cv10261
Petitioner:
Marcello Almeida
Respondent:
Brad Cowin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Epiphany et al v. Turco et al
as 1:2018cv12260
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare (MPCH), Director of Security, Despina and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lewis, Bishop Lazarre King Epiphany, Jr and Epiphany Lazaru King Lazarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McSweeney v. Brockton et al
as 1:2018cv10968
Plaintiff:
Kory McSweeney
Defendant:
City of Brockton, Erik Hilliard, Callie Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
