Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almond et al v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Donnie Strain, Jody McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Roberts Almond and Gregory Jack Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 7:2018cv01390
Defendant:
Steven T Marshall, State of Alabama and Bradley Almond
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buggs v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00711
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Bradley Almond and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littleton v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv03847
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Demeatrice Littleton
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Sheila Taylor and Sherly Miller
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv03682
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Charles R McLone, John H England, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Charles R. Malone, John H. England, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eubanks v. Almond et al
as 7:2010cv01909
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Eubanks
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Scott Holmes, Belinda Medlers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
