Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Williams v. Unknown Inmate 1 et al
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alvin Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Inmate 1 and Unknown Inmate 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Voorhies et al
as 3:2021cv00636
Plaintiff:
Alvin Williams
Defendant:
David Voorhies and Omar Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pierce et al
as 1:2018cv01383
Defendant:
Unknown VSA Examiner, J. Fike, Juan Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2015cv01253
Petitioner:
Clarence Alvin Williams
Respondent:
State of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Secretary, Deparment of Corrections, et al
as 6:2015cv01801
Petitioner:
Clarence Alvin Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2015cv00192
Petitioner:
CLARENCE ALVIN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fraser
as 1:2015cv02131
Plaintiff:
Alvin Williams
Defendant:
Joan C. Fraser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvin Williams v. Randy Pfister
as 14-3120
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER
Williams v. USA -2255
as 1:2014cv02893
Petitioner:
Alvin Williams
Respondent:
USA -2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ardie Nolon, III v. Alvin W. Keller, Jr.
as 14-6421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARDIE D. NOLON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILCOX, Pamlico Correctional Institution and JOHN C. HERRING, Asst. Superintendent Custody
Defendant:
THEODIS BECK, Former Secretary of North Carolina Department of Correction, ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., Secretary, DR. PAULA Y. SMITH, Director / Chief Health Care Services North Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
