Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Tucker Meuse v. Gundersen et al
as 1:2018cv02829
Defendant:
Joyce Davidson, Doris Gundersen, CPHP and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker Meuse v. Gundersen et al
as 1:2018cv02827
Defendant:
Joyce Davidson, Doris Gundersen, CPHP and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker Meuse v. Gunderson
as 1:2018cv02824
Defendant:
Joyce Davidson, CPHP, Heidi Letko and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Concrete Equipment Company, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00384
Defendant:
Concrete Equipment Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gibson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstrong et al v. Merced County et al
as 1:2011at00612
Plaintiff:
Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong
Defendant:
Merced County, Mark Pazin, James Buttrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong et al v. Merced County et al
as 1:2011cv01632
Plaintiff:
Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong
Defendant:
Merced County, Mark Pazin, James Buttrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2010cv00592
Plaintiff:
Rachel Prescott, A.P., C.P. and others
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Adam Christianson, California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Byron H Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
