Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Tony et al
as 0:2023cv61891
Plaintiff:
Jeoffrey White
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony, Roberto Ramos, Amanda Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Birair et al v. Kolycheck et al
as 2:2015cv01807
Plaintiff:
Obeidalla Birair and Intisar Birair
Defendant:
Edmond Kolycheck, Sarah Kramer, Candida Carrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leanna Smith v. Kathryn Coffman, et al
as 14-15473
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEANNA SMITH, individual and as the mother of CR, a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHRYN COFFMAN, MD and ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, owned and operated by an Arizona Corporation: other Catholic Healthcare West, DBA Dignity Health
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TAMMY HAMILTON-MACALPINE, wife, UNKNOWN HAMILTON-MACALPINE, named as: spouse Hamilton-Macalpine/husband and others
Leanna Smith v. State of Arizona, et al
as 14-15390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEANNA SMITH, individual and as the mother of CR, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TAMMY HAMILTON-MACALPINE, wife, UNKNOWN HAMILTON-MACALPINE, named as: spouse Hamilton-Macalpine/husband and others
Smith v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Leanna Smith
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Tammy Hamilton-Macalpine , Unknown Hamilton-Macalpine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WHITT et al v. TORRES et al
as 3:2008cv02045
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WHITT, DANIEL BLUNCK, NANCY BLUNCK and others
Defendant:
AMANDA TORRES, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, BOROUGH OF LAKEHURST and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
