Cases 51 - 60 of 3,283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Turner v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Anna Turner
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
GRAMS et al v. AMAZON.COM INC et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN GRAMS and KRISTA GRAMS
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC and SHENZHEN KANGERJIAN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Turner v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024at00408
Plaintiff:
Anna Turner
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Kerr v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
John Kerr
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., H&H Brothers LLC, Aslam Yusupov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KERR v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
JOHN KERR
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., H&H Brothers LLC, Aslam Yusupov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1633
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1634
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Gavina v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
as 5:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jose Gavina
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hogan, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1893
Plaintiff:
ANGELA HOGAN, ANDREA SEBERSON and CHRISTOPHER HOPPER
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
