Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PETERSON et al v. AMBROSE
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TROY PETERSON
Counter Defendant:
LISA PETERSON
Defendant:
JAMES AMBROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AMBROSE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DONNA DENISE AMBROSE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ambrose v. Boston Globe Media Partners LLC
as 1:2022cv10195
Plaintiff:
David Ambrose
Defendant:
Boston Globe Media Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toekulah v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2020cv40155
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Rudy Ogando Perez and Joseph Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Toekulah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMBROSE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2019cv00133
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DONNA DENISE AMBROSE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10944
Plaintiff:
Sheena Grice
Defendant:
VIM Holdings Group, LLC , Michael D'Ambrose , Hirsch Mohindra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMBROSE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
DONNA AMBROSE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
