Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reaves v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., et al
as 5:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Margaret Reaves
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STIDHAM v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.
as 1:2012cv00487
Plaintiff:
SUSAN CAROL STIDHAM
Defendant:
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
FOGNER v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.
as 1:2011cv01073
Plaintiff:
JUDITH W. FOGNER
Defendant:
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adolphe v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Robyn Adolphe
Defendant:
Option One Mortgage Corporation, Jeffery A. Bunda, David Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
FERGUSON et al v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00670
Plaintiff:
WALTER FERGUSON and CHARLENE FERGUSON
Defendant:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., U.S. BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adolphe v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00620
Plaintiff:
Robyn Adolphe
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Leskar et al v. Power REO Management Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
David Leskar and Cheryl Leskar
Defendant:
Power REO Management Services, Inc. and American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Harris et al v. American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Veronica Harris and Niquae Harris
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc. and American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
