Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BERGEN COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv08845
Plaintiff:
BERGEN COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., DR. RICHARD SACKLER, ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Eli Mor v. Steven Collis, et al
as 15-2831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELI MOR, derivatively on behalf of AmerisourceBergen Corporation and individually on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated shareholders of AmerisourceBergen Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN COLLIS, RICHARD GOCHNAUER, RICHARD GOZON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KELLEY v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP.,
as 5:2008cv02377
Plaintiff:
SUSAN I KELLEY
Defendant:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP.,
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner:
TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
