Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Ruppert Sales & Engineering v. Amphenol Corporation, et al
as 5:2016cv01044
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ruppert Sales & Engineering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Begin v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00830
Defendant:
CSR, Ltd, Air & Liquid System Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ginny Begin and William D. Begin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amphenol Corporation v. Paul
as 14-547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Amphenol Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Paul and TE Connectivity, Ltd.
Amphenol Corporation et al v. PCT International, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01468
Plaintiff:
Amphenol Corporation and Times Fiber Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
PCT International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Amphenol Corporation v. TE Connectivity, Ltd.
as 1:2012mc00333
Plaintiff:
Amphenol Corporation
Defendant:
TE Connectivity, Ltd.
Miscellaneous_party:
Richard Paul
Amphenol Corporation v. Paul
as 3:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
Amphenol Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artis et al v. Amphenol Corporation
as 3:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Crystal Artis , Helen Ballard , Raymond Ballard and others
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MUSSELMAN v. AMPHENOL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv69486
Defendant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, AMPHENOL CORPORATION, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Special Master:
VINCENT J. POPPITI
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. MUSSELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MUSSELMAN v. AMPHENOL CORPORATION et al
as DE/1:10-CV-00101
Defendant:
AMPHENOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MUSSELMAN
Musselman v. Amphenol Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00101
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC, Amphenol Corporation, Bondex International Inc. and others
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
Plaintiff:
Michael Musselman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
